arXiv · 2109.07305
Distributed flexibility as a cost-effective alternative to grid reinforcement
Abstract
The deployment of distributed photovoltaics (PV) in low-voltage networks may cause technical issues such as voltage rises, line ampacity violations, and transformer overloading for distribution system operators (DSOs). These problems may induce high grid reinforcement costs. In this work, we assume the DSO can control each prosumer's battery and PV system. Under such assumptions, we evaluate the cost of providing flexibility and compare it with grid reinforcement costs. Our results highlight that using distributed flexibility is more profitable than reinforcing a low-voltage network until the PV generation covers 145% of the network annual energy demand.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Jordan Holweger, Christophe Ballif, Nicolas Wyrsch. 2021-09-15. Distributed flexibility as a cost-effective alternative to grid reinforcement. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07305
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.