SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2109.07738

Noise Robust Core-Stable Coalitions of Hedonic Games

Abstract

We consider the coalition formation games with an additional component, `noisy preferences'. Moreover, such noisy preferences are available only for a sample of coalitions. We propose a multiplicative noise model and obtain the prediction probability, defined as the probability that the estimated PAC core-stable partition of the noisy game is also PAC core-stable for the unknown noise-free game. This prediction probability depends on the probability of a combinatorial construct called an `agreement event'. We explicitly obtain the agreement probability for $n$ agent noisy game with l\geq 2 support noise distribution. For a user-given satisfaction value on this probability, we identify the noise regimes for which an estimated partition is noise robust; that is, it is PAC core-stable in both noisy and noise-free games. We obtain similar robustness results when the estimated partition is not PAC core-stable. These noise regimes correspond to the level sets of the agreement probability function and are non-convex sets. Moreover, an important fact is that the prediction probability can be high even if high noise values occur with a high probability. Further, for a class of top-responsive hedonic games, we obtain the bounds on the extra noisy samples required to get noise robustness with a user-given satisfaction value. We completely solve the noise robustness problem of a $2$ agent hedonic game. In particular, we obtain the prediction probability function for l=2 and l=3 noise support cases. For l=2, the prediction probability is convex in noise probability, but the noise robust regime is non-convex. Its minimum value, called the safety value, is 0.62; so, below 0.62, the noise robust regime is the entire probability simplex. However, for l \geq 3, the prediction probability is non-convex; so, the safety value is the global minima of a non-convex function and is computationally hard.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Prashant Trivedi, Nandyala Hemachandra. 2021-09-16. Noise Robust Core-Stable Coalitions of Hedonic Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07738

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT