SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2109.09215

Towards characterizing the $>\omega^2$-fickle recursively enumerable Turing degrees

Abstract

Given a finite lattice $L$ that can be embedded in the recursively enumerable (r.e.) Turing degrees $\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{T}}$, it is not known how one can characterize the degrees $\mathbf{d}\in\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{T}}$ below which $L$ can be bounded. Two important characterizations are of the $L_7$ and $M_3$ lattices, where the lattices are bounded below $\mathbf{d}$ if and only if $\mathbf{d}$ contains sets of ``\emph{fickleness}'' $>\omega$ and $\geq\omega^\omega$ respectively. We work towards finding a lattice that characterizes the levels above $\omega^2$, the first non-trivial level after $\omega$. We considered lattices that are as ``short'' and ``narrow'' as $L_7$ and $M_3$, but the lattices characterize also the $>\omega$ or $\geq\omega^\omega$ levels, if the lattices are not already embeddable below all non-zero r.e.\ degrees. We also considered upper semilattices (USLs) by removing the bottom meet(s) of some previously considered lattices, but the removals did not change the levels characterized. This leads us to conjecture that a USL characterizes the same r.e.\ degrees as the lattice it is based on. We discovered three lattices besides $M_3$ that also characterize the $\geq\omega^\omega$-levels. Our search for a $>\omega^2$-candidate therefore involves the lattice-theoretic problem of finding lattices that do not contain any of the four $\geq\omega^\omega$-lattices as sublattices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Liling Ko. 2021-09-19. Towards characterizing the $>\omega^2$-fickle recursively enumerable Turing degrees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09215

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO