Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2109.10698

Complementing the Linear-Programming Learning Experience with the Design and Use of Computerized Games: The Formula 1 Championship Game

Gerardo L. Febres
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This document focuses on modeling a complex situations to achieve an advantage within a competitive context. Our goal is to devise the characteristics of games to teach and exercise non-easily quantifiable tasks crucial to the math-modeling process. A computerized game to exercise the math-modeling process and optimization problem formulation is introduced. The game is named The Formula 1 Championship, and models of the game were developed in the computerized simulation platform MoNet. It resembles some situations in which team managers must make crucial decisions to enhance their racing cars up to the feasible, most advantageous conditions. This paper describes the game's rules, limitations, and five Formula 1 circuit simulators used for the championship development. We present several formulations of this situation in the form of optimization problems. Administering the budget to reach the best car adjustment to a set of circuits to win the respective races can be an approach. Focusing on the best distribution of each Grand Prix's budget and then deciding how to use the assigned money to improve the car is also the right approach. In general, there may be a degree of conflict among these approaches because they are different aspects of the same multi-scale optimization problem. Therefore, we evaluate the impact of assigning the highest priority to an element, or another, when formulating the optimization problem. Studying the effectiveness of solving such optimization problems turns out to be an exciting way of evaluating the advantages of focusing on one scale or another. Another thread of this research directs to the meaning of the game in the teaching-learning process. We believe applying the Formula 1 Game is an effective way to discover opportunities in a complex-system situation and formulate them to finally extract and concrete the related benefit to the context described.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gerardo L. Febres. 2021-09-19. Complementing the Linear-Programming Learning Experience with the Design and Use of Computerized Games: The Formula 1 Championship Game. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.10698

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗