Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2109.12401

Incentives in Dominant Resource Fair Allocation under Dynamic Demands

Giannis Fikioris·Rachit Agarwal·Éva Tardos
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Every computer system -- from schedulers in clouds (e.g. Amazon) to computer networks to operating systems -- performs resource allocation across system users. The defacto allocation policies are max-min fairness (MMF) for single resources and dominant resource fairness (DRF) for multiple resources which guarantee properties like incentive compatibility, envy-freeness, and Pareto efficiency, assuming user demands are static (time-independent). However, in real-world systems, user demands are dynamic, i.e. time-dependant. As a result, there is now a fundamental mismatch between the goals of computer systems and the properties enabled by classic resource allocation policies. We aim to bridge this mismatch. When demands are dynamic, instant-by-instant MMF can be extremely unfair over longer periods of time, i.e. lead to unbalanced user allocations as previous allocations have no effect in the present. We consider a natural generalization of MMF and DRF for multiple resources and users with dynamic demands: this algorithm ensures that user allocations are as max-min fair as possible up to any time instant, given past allocations. This dynamic mechanism remains Pareto optimal and envy-free, but not incentive compatible. However, our results show that the possible increase in utility by misreporting is bounded and, since this can lead to significant decrease in overall useful allocation, this suggests that it is not a useful strategy. Our main result is to show that our dynamic DRF algorithm is $(1+\rho)$-incentive compatible, where $\rho$ quantifies the relative importance of a resource for different users; we show that this factor is tight even with only two resources. We also present a $3/2$ upper bound and a $\sqrt 2$ lower bound for incentive compatibility when there is only one resource. We also offer extensions for the case when users are weighted to prioritize them differently.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Giannis Fikioris, Rachit Agarwal, Éva Tardos. 2021-09-25. Incentives in Dominant Resource Fair Allocation under Dynamic Demands. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12401

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗