Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2109.12600

Evolution systems: A framework for studying generic mathematical structures

Wiesław Kubiś·Paulina Radecka
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We introduce the concept of an abstract evolution system, which provides a convenient framework for studying generic mathematical structures and their properties. Roughly speaking, an evolution system is a category endowed with a selected class of morphisms called transitions, and with a selected object called the origin. We illustrate it by a series of examples from several areas of mathematics. We formulate sufficient conditions for the existence of the unique "most complicated" evolution. In case the evolution system "lives" in model theory and nontrivial transitions are one-point extensions, the limit of the most complicated evolution is known under the name Fraisse limit, a unique countable universal homogeneous model determined by a fixed class of finitely generated models satisfying some obvious axioms. Evolution systems can also be viewed as a generalization of abstract rewriting systems, where the partially ordered set is replaced by a category. In our setting, the process of rewriting plays a nontrivial role, whereas in rewriting systems only the result of a rewriting procedure is relevant. An analogue of Newman's Lemma holds in our setting, although the proof is a bit more delicate, nevertheless, still based on Huet's idea using well founded induction.

Explore related subjects

math.LOmath.CT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wiesław Kubiś, Paulina Radecka. 2021-09-26. Evolution systems: A framework for studying generic mathematical structures. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12600

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗