Preemptive Two-stage Goal-Programming Formulation of a Strict Version of the Unbounded Knapsack Problem with Bounded Weights

Michael Beyer; Steven Mills

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2109.13686

Preemptive Two-stage Goal-Programming Formulation of a Strict Version of the Unbounded Knapsack Problem with Bounded Weights

Michael Beyer·Steven Mills

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The unbounded knapsack problem with bounded weights is a variant of the well-studied variant of the traditional binary knapsack problem; key changes being the relaxation of the binary constraint and allowing the unit weights of each item to fall within a range. In this paper, we formulate a variant of this problem, which we call the strict unbounded knapsack problem with bounded weights, by replacing the inequality constraint on the total weight with an equality. We show that this problem can be decomposed into a two-stage, pre-emptive goal programming problem, with the first stage being a 2-dimensional knapsack problem and the second being either a linear feasibility program (per canonical formulation) or simply a linearly-constrained program in the general case. This reformulation is shown to be equivalent to the original formulation but allows the use of well-studied, efficient algorithms for multidimensional knapsack problems. In addition, it separates the modeling effort around what to put in the knapsack from considerations around what unit weight one should assign to each item type, providing substantially more flexibility to the modeler without adding complexity to the choice of knapsack configuration. Finally, we show that for the feasibility version of the second stage, one can immediately get a feasible solution to the first stage solution.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS math.OC stat.OT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Michael Beyer, Steven Mills. 2021-09-26. Preemptive Two-stage Goal-Programming Formulation of a Strict Version of the Unbounded Knapsack Problem with Bounded Weights. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.13686

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗