SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2110.00707

Functional outlier detection for density-valued data with application to robustify distribution to distribution regression

Abstract

Distributional data analysis, concerned with statistical analysis and modeling for data objects consisting of random probability density functions (PDFs) in the framework of functional data analysis (FDA), has received considerable interest in recent years. However, many important aspects remain unexplored, such as outlier detection and robustness. Existing functional outlier detection methods are mainly used for ordinary functional data and usually perform poorly when applied to PDFs. To fill this gap, this study focuses on PDF-valued outlier detection, as well as its application in robust distributional regression. Similar to ordinary functional data, detecting the shape outlier masked by the "curve net" formed by the bulk of the PDFs is the major challenge in PDF-outlier detection. To this end, we propose a tree-structured transformation system for feature extraction as well as converting the shape outliers to easily detectable magnitude outliers, relevant outlier detectors are designed for the specific transformed data. A multiple detection strategy is also proposed to account for detection uncertainties and to combine different detectors to form a more reliable detection tool. Moreover, we propose a distributional-regression-based approach for detecting the abnormal associations of PDF-valued two-tuples. As a specific application, the proposed outlier detection methods are applied to robustify a distribution-to-distribution regression method, and we develop a robust estimator for the regression operator by downweighting the detected outliers. The proposed methods are validated and evaluated by extensive simulation studies or real data applications. Relevant comparative studies demonstrate the superiority of the developed outlier detection method with other competitors in distributional outlier detection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xinyi Lei, Zhicheng Chen, Hui Li. 2021-10-02. Functional outlier detection for density-valued data with application to robustify distribution to distribution regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00707

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME