SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2110.00827

Deterministic Algorithms for the Hidden Subgroup Problem

Abstract

We consider deterministic algorithms for the well-known hidden subgroup problem ($\mathsf{HSP}$): for a finite group $G$ and a finite set $X$, given a function $f:G \to X$ and the promise that for any $g_1, g_2 \in G, f(g_1) = f(g_2)$ iff $g_1H=g_2H$ for a subgroup $H \le G$, the goal of the decision version is to determine whether $H$ is trivial or not, and the goal of the identification version is to identify $H$. An algorithm for the problem should query $f(g)$ for $g\in G$ at least as possible. Nayak asked whether there exist deterministic algorithms with $O(\sqrt{\frac{|G|}{|H|}})$ query complexity for $\mathsf{HSP}$. We answer this problem by proving the following results, which also extend the main results of Ref. [30], since here the algorithms do not rely on any prior knowledge of $H$. (i)When $G$ is a general finite Abelian group, there exist an algorithm with $O(\sqrt{\frac{|G|}{|H|}})$ queries to decide the triviality of $H$ and an algorithm to identify $H$ with $O(\sqrt{\frac{|G|}{|H|}\log |H|}+\log |H|)$ queries. (ii)In general there is no deterministic algorithm for the identification version of $\mathsf{HSP}$ with query complexity of $O(\sqrt{\frac{|G|}{|H|}})$, since there exists an instance of $\mathsf{HSP}$ that needs $\omega(\sqrt{\frac{|G|}{|H|}})$ queries to identify $H$. $f(x)$ is said to be $\omega(g(x))$ if for every positive constant $C$, there exists a positive constant $N$ such that for $x>N$, $f(x)\ge C\cdot g(x)$, which means $g$ is a strict lower bound for $f$. On the other hand, there exist instances of $\mathsf{HSP}$ with query complexity far smaller than $O(\sqrt{\frac{|G|}{|H|}})$, whose query complexity is $O(\log \frac{|G|}{|H|})$ and even $O(1)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zekun Ye, Lvzhou Li. 2021-10-02. Deterministic Algorithms for the Hidden Subgroup Problem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2022.104975

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS