SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2110.02830

Parameterized Algorithms for the Steiner Arborescence Problem on a Hypercube

Abstract

Motivated by a phylogeny reconstruction problem in evolutionary biology, we study the minimum Steiner arborescence problem on directed hypercubes (MSA-DH). Given $m$, representing the directed hypercube $\vec{Q}_m$, and a set of terminals $R$, the problem asks to find a Steiner arborescence that spans $R$ with minimum cost. As $m$ implicitly represents $\vec{Q}_m$ comprising $2^{m}$ vertices, the running time analyses of traditional Steiner tree algorithms on general graphs does not give a clear understanding of the actual complexity of this problem. We present algorithms that exploit the structure of the hypercube and run in time polynomial in $|R|$ and $m$. We explore the MSA-DH problem on three natural parameters - $R$, and two above-guarantee parameters, number of Steiner nodes $p$ and penalty $q$. For above-guarantee parameters, the parameterized MSA-DH problem takes $p \geq 0$ or $q\geq 0$ as input, and outputs a Steiner arborescence with at most $|R| + p - 1$ or $m + q$ edges respectively. We present the following results ($\tilde{\mathcal{O}}$ hides the polynomial factors): 1. An exact algorithm that runs in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(3^{|R|})$ time. 2. A randomized algorithm that runs in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(9^q)$ time with success probability $\geq 4^{-q}$. 3. An exact algorithm that runs in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(36^q)$ time. 4. A $(1+q)$-approximation algorithm that runs in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1.25284^q)$ time. 5. An $\mathcal{O}\left(p\ell_{\mathrm{max}} \right)$-additive approximation algorithm that runs in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\ell_{\mathrm{max}}^{p+2})$ time, where $\ell_{\mathrm{max}}$ is the maximum distance of any terminal from the root.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sugyani Mahapatra, Manikandan Narayanan, N S Narayanaswamy. 2021-10-06. Parameterized Algorithms for the Steiner Arborescence Problem on a Hypercube. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02830

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS