Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2110.03122

Faster algorithm for Unique $(k,2)$-CSP

Or Zamir
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In a $(k,2)$-Constraint Satisfaction Problem we are given a set of arbitrary constraints on pairs of $k$-ary variables, and are asked to find an assignment of values to these variables such that all constraints are satisfied. The $(k,2)$-CSP problem generalizes problems like $k$-coloring and $k$-list-coloring. In the Unique $(k,2)$-CSP problem, we add the assumption that the input set of constraints has at most one satisfying assignment. Beigel and Eppstein gave an algorithm for $(k,2)$-CSP running in time $O\left(\left(0.4518k\right)^n\right)$ for $k>3$ and $O\left(1.356^n\right)$ for $k=3$, where $n$ is the number of variables. Feder and Motwani improved upon the Beigel-Eppstein algorithm for $k\geq 11$. Hertli, Hurbain, Millius, Moser, Scheder and Szedl{\'a}k improved these bounds for Unique $(k,2)$-CSP for every $k\geq 5$. We improve the result of Hertli et al. and obtain better bounds for Unique~$(k,2)$-CSP for~$k\geq 5$. In particular, we improve the running time of Unique~$(5,2)$-CSP from~$O\left(2.254^n\right)$ to~$O\left(2.232^n\right)$ and Unique~$(6,2)$-CSP from~$O\left(2.652^n\right)$ to~$O\left(2.641^n\right)$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Or Zamir. 2021-10-07. Faster algorithm for Unique $(k,2)$-CSP. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.03122

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗