SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2110.08005

Spatially Adaptive Calibrations of AirBox PM$_{2.5}$ Data

Abstract

Two networks are available to monitor PM$_{2.5}$ in Taiwan, including the Taiwan Air Quality Monitoring Network (TAQMN) and the AirBox network. The TAQMN, managed by Taiwan's Environmental Protection Administration (EPA), provides high-quality PM$_{2.5}$ measurements at $77$ monitoring stations. More recently, the AirBox network was launched, consisting of low-cost, small internet-of-things (IoT) microsensors (i.e., AirBoxes) at thousands of locations. While the AirBox network provides broad spatial coverage, its measurements are not reliable and require calibrations. However, applying a universal calibration procedure to all AirBoxes does not work well because the calibration curves vary with several factors, including the chemical compositions of PM$_{2.5}$, which are not homogeneous in space. Therefore, different calibrations are needed at different locations with different local environments. Unfortunately, most AirBoxes are not close to EPA stations, making the calibration task challenging. In this article, we propose a spatial model with spatially varying coefficients to account for heteroscedasticity in the data. Our method gives adaptive calibrations of AirBoxes according to their local conditions and provides accurate PM$_{2.5}$ concentrations at any location in Taiwan, incorporating two types of measurements. In addition, the proposed method automatically calibrates measurements from a new AirBox once it is added to the network. We illustrate our approach using hourly PM$_{2.5}$ data in the year 2020. After the calibration, the results show that the PM$_{2.5}$ prediction improves about 37% to 67% in root mean-squared prediction error for matching EPA data. In particular, once the calibration curves are established, we can obtain reliable PM$_{2.5}$ values at any location in Taiwan, even if we ignore EPA data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

ShengLi Tzeng, Chi-Wei Lai, Hsin-Cheng Huang. 2021-10-15. Spatially Adaptive Calibrations of AirBox PM$_{2.5}$ Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME