SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2110.11723

A Simple Boosting Framework for Transshipment

Abstract

Transshipment, also known under the names of earth mover's distance, uncapacitated min-cost flow, or Wasserstein's metric, is an important and well-studied problem that asks to find a flow of minimum cost that routes a general demand vector. Adding to its importance, recent advancements in our understanding of algorithms for transshipment have led to breakthroughs for the fundamental problem of computing shortest paths. Specifically, the recent near-optimal $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate single-source shortest path algorithms in the parallel and distributed settings crucially solve transshipment as a central step of their approach. The key property that differentiates transshipment from other similar problems like shortest path is the so-called \emph{boosting}: one can boost a (bad) approximate solution to a near-optimal $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximate solution. This conceptually reduces the problem to finding an approximate solution. However, not all approximations can be boosted -- there have been several proposed approaches that were shown to be susceptible to boosting, and a few others where boosting was left as an open question. The main takeaway of our paper is that any black-box $\alpha$-approximate transshipment solver that computes a \emph{dual} solution can be boosted to an $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximate solver. Moreover, we significantly simplify and decouple previous approaches to transshipment (in sequential, parallel, and distributed settings) by showing all of them (implicitly) obtain approximate dual solutions. Our analysis is very simple and relies only on the well-known multiplicative weights framework. Furthermore, to keep the paper completely self-contained, we provide a new (and arguably much simpler) analysis of multiplicative weights that leverages well-known optimization tools to bypass the ad-hoc calculations used in the standard analyses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Goran Zuzic. 2021-10-22. A Simple Boosting Framework for Transshipment. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.11723

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS