SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2110.12743

Collapsing the Tower -- On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs

Abstract

In this paper we study the computational complexity of solving a class of block structured integer programs (IPs) - so called multistage stochastic IPs. A multistage stochastic IP is an IP of the form $\max \{ c^T x \mid \mathcal{A} x = b, \,l \leq x \leq u,\, x\text{ integral} \}$ where the constraint matrix $\mathcal{A}$ consists of small block matrices ordered on the diagonal line and for each stage there are larger blocks with few columns connecting the blocks in a tree like fashion. Over the last years there was enormous progress in the area of block structured IPs. For many of the known block IP classes - such as $n$-fold, tree-fold, and two-stage stochastic IPs, nearly matching upper and lower bounds are known concerning their computational complexity. One of the major gaps that remained however was the parameter dependency in the running time for an algorithm solving multistage stochastic IPs. Previous algorithms require a tower of $t$ exponentials, where $t$ is the number of stages, while only a double exponential lower bound was known. In this paper we show that the tower of $t$ exponentials is actually not necessary. We can show an improved running time for the algorithm solving multistage stochastic IPs with a running time of $2^{(d\||A||_\infty)^{\mathcal{O}(d^{3t+1})}} \cdot poly(d,n)$, where $d$ is the sum of columns in the connecting blocks and $n$ is the number of blocks on the lowest stage. In contrast to previous works, our algorithm has only a triple exponential dependency on the parameters and only doubly exponential for every constant $t$. By this we come very close the known double exponential bound (based on the exponential time hypothesis) that holds already for two-stage stochastic IPs, i.e. multistage stochastic IPs with only two stages.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kim-Manuel Klein, Janina Reuter. 2021-10-25. Collapsing the Tower -- On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.12743

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS