SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2110.13350

Polynomial Integrality Gap of Flow LP for Directed Steiner Tree

Abstract

In the Directed Steiner Tree (DST) problem, we are given a directed graph $G=(V,E)$ on $n$ vertices with edge-costs $c \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^E$, a root vertex $r \in V$, and a set $K \subseteq V \setminus \{r\}$ of $k$ terminals. The goal is to find a minimum-cost subgraph of $G$ that contains a path from $r$ to every terminal $t \in K$. DST has been a notorious problem for decades as there is a large gap between the best-known polynomial-time approximation ratio of $O(k^\epsilon)$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, and the best quasi-polynomial-time approximation ratio of $O\left(\frac{\log^2 k}{\log \log k}\right)$. Towards understanding this gap, we study the integrality gap of the standard flow LP relaxation for the problem. We show that the LP has an integrality gap of $\Omega(n^{0.0418})$. Previously, the integrality gap of the LP is only known to be $\Omega\left(\frac{\log^2n}{\log\log n}\right)$ [Halperin~et~al., SODA'03 \& SIAM J.~Comput.] and $\Omega(\sqrt{k})$ [Zosin-Khuller, SODA'02] in some instance with $\sqrt{k}=O\left(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n}\right)$. Our result gives the first known lower bound on the integrality gap of this standard LP that is polynomial in $n$, the number of vertices. Consequently, we rule out the possibility of developing a poly-logarithmic approximation algorithm for the problem based on the flow LP relaxation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shi Li, Bundit Laekhanukit. 2021-10-26. Polynomial Integrality Gap of Flow LP for Directed Steiner Tree. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.13350

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS