SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2111.01848

Improved Iteration Complexities for Overconstrained $p$-Norm Regression

Abstract

In this paper we obtain improved iteration complexities for solving $\ell_p$ regression. We provide methods which given any full-rank $\mathbf{A} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ with $n \geq d$, $b \in \mathbb{R}^n$, and $p \geq 2$ solve $\min_{x \in \mathbb{R}^d} \left\|\mathbf{A} x - b\right\|_p$ to high precision in time dominated by that of solving $\widetilde{O}_p(d^{\frac{p-2}{3p-2}})$ linear systems in $\mathbf{A}^\top \mathbf{D} \mathbf{A}$ for positive diagonal matrices $\mathbf{D}$. This improves upon the previous best iteration complexity of $\widetilde{O}_p(n^{\frac{p-2}{3p-2}})$ (Adil, Kyng, Peng, Sachdeva 2019). As a corollary, we obtain an $\widetilde{O}(d^{1/3}\epsilon^{-2/3})$ iteration complexity for approximate $\ell_\infty$ regression. Further, for $q \in (1, 2]$ and dual norm $q = p/(p-1)$ we provide an algorithm that solves $\ell_q$ regression in $\widetilde{O}(d^{\frac{p-2}{2p-2}})$ iterations. To obtain this result we analyze row reweightings (closely inspired by $\ell_p$-norm Lewis weights) which allow a closer connection between $\ell_2$ and $\ell_p$ regression. We provide adaptations of two different iterative optimization frameworks which leverage this connection and yield our results. The first framework is based on iterative refinement and multiplicative weights based width reduction and the second framework is based on highly smooth acceleration. Both approaches yield $\widetilde{O}_p(d^{\frac{p-2}{3p-2}})$ iteration methods but the second has a polynomial dependence on $p$ (as opposed to the exponential dependence of the first algorithm) and provides a new alternative to the previous state-of-the-art methods for $\ell_p$ regression for large $p$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arun Jambulapati, Yang P. Liu, Aaron Sidford. 2021-11-02. Improved Iteration Complexities for Overconstrained $p$-Norm Regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.01848

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS