Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2111.02022

Approximate Gomory-Hu Tree Is Faster Than $n-1$ Max-Flows

Jason Li·Debmalya Panigrahi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Gomory-Hu tree or cut tree (Gomory and Hu, 1961) is a classic data structure for reporting $(s,t)$ mincuts (and by duality, the values of $(s,t)$ maxflows) for all pairs of vertices $s$ and $t$ in an undirected graph. Gomory and Hu showed that it can be computed using $n-1$ exact maxflow computations. Surprisingly, this remains the best algorithm for Gomory-Hu trees more than 50 years later, *even for approximate mincuts*. In this paper, we break this longstanding barrier and give an algorithm for computing a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate Gomory-Hu tree using $\text{polylog}(n)$ maxflow computations. Specifically, we obtain the runtime bounds we describe below. We obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, weighted graphs that runs in $\tilde O(m + n^{3/2})$ time and returns a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm w.h.p. Previously, the best running time known was $\tilde O(n^{5/2})$, which is obtained by running Gomory and Hu's original algorithm on a cut sparsifier of the graph. Next, we obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, unweighted graphs that runs in $m^{4/3+o(1)}$ time and returns a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm w.h.p. This improves on our first result for sparse graphs, namely $m = o(n^{9/8})$. Previously, the best running time known for unweighted graphs was $\tilde O(mn)$ for an exact Gomory-Hu tree (Bhalgat et al., STOC 2007); no better result was known if approximations are allowed. As a consequence of our Gomory-Hu tree algorithms, we also solve the $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate all pairs mincut and single source mincut problems in the same time bounds. (These problems are simpler in that the goal is to only return the $(s,t)$ mincut values, and not the mincuts.) This improves on the recent algorithm for these problems in $\tilde O(n^2)$ time due to Abboud et al. (FOCS 2020).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jason Li, Debmalya Panigrahi. 2021-11-03. Approximate Gomory-Hu Tree Is Faster Than $n-1$ Max-Flows. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02022

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗