SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2111.02318

Nearly Tight Lower Bounds for Succinct Range Minimum Query

Abstract

Given an array of distinct integers $A[1\ldots n]$, the Range Minimum Query (RMQ) problem requires us to construct a data structure from $A$, supporting the RMQ query: given an interval $[a,b]\subseteq[1,n]$, return the index of the minimum element in subarray $A[a\ldots b]$, i.e. return $\text{argmin}_{i\in[a,b]}A[i]$. The fundamental problem has a long history. The textbook solution which uses $O(n)$ words of space and $O(1)$ time by Gabow, Bentley, Tarjan (STOC 1984) and Harel, Tarjan (SICOMP 1984) dates back to 1980s. The state-of-the-art solution is presented by Fischer, Heun (SICOMP 2011) and Navarro, Sadakane (TALG 2014). The solution uses $2n-1.5\log n+n/\left(\frac{\log n}{t}\right)^t+\tilde{O}(n^{3/4})$ bits of space and $O(t)$ query time, where the additive $\tilde{O}(n^{3/4})$ is a pre-computed lookup table used in the RAM model, assuming the word-size is $\Theta(\log n)$ bits. On the other hand, the only known lower bound is proved by Liu and Yu (STOC 2020). They show that any data structure which solves RMQ in $t$ query time must use $2n-1.5\log n+n/(\log n)^{O(t^2\log^2t)}$ bits of space, assuming the word-size is $\Theta(\log n)$ bits. In this paper, we prove nearly tight lower bound for this problem. We show that, for any data structure which solves RMQ in $t$ query time, $2n-1.5\log n+n/(\log n)^{O(t\log^2t)}$ bits of space is necessary in the cell-probe model with word-size $\Theta(\log n)$ bits. We emphasize that, in terms of time complexity, our lower bound is tight up to a polylogarithmic factor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mingmou Liu. 2021-11-03. Nearly Tight Lower Bounds for Succinct Range Minimum Query. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02318

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS