SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2111.11460

On the Local Communication Complexity of Counting and Modular Arithmetic

Abstract

In standard number-in-hand multi-party communication complexity, performance is measured as the total number of bits transmitted globally in the network. In this paper, we study a variation called local communication complexity in which performance instead measures the maximum number of bits sent or received at any one player. We focus on a simple model where $n$ players, each with one input bit, execute a protocol by exchanging messages to compute a function on the $n$ input bits. We ask what can and cannot be solved with a small local communication complexity in this setting. We begin by establishing a non-trivial lower bound on the local complexity for a specific function by proving that counting the number of $1$'s among the first $17$ input bits distributed among the participants requires a local complexity strictly greater than $1$. We further investigate whether harder counting problems of this type can yield stronger lower bounds, providing a largely negative answer by showing that constant local complexity is sufficient to count the number $1$ bits over the entire input, and therefore compute any symmetric function. In addition to counting, we show that both sorting and searching can be computed in constant local complexity. We then use the counting solution as a subroutine to demonstrate that constant local complexity is also sufficient to compute many standard modular arithmetic operations on two operands, including: comparisons, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and exponentiation. Finally we establish that function $GCD(x,y)$ where $x$ and $y$ are in the range $[1,n]$ has local complexity of $O(1)$. Our work highlights both new techniques for proving lower bounds on this metric and the power of even a small amount of local communication.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bala Kalyanasundaram, Calvin Newport. 2021-11-22. On the Local Communication Complexity of Counting and Modular Arithmetic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11460

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS