Maximizing Social Welfare in Selfish Multi-Modal Routing using Strategic Information Design for Quantal Response Travelers

Sainath Sanga; Venkata Sriram Siddhardh Nadendla; Sajal K. Das

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2111.15069

Maximizing Social Welfare in Selfish Multi-Modal Routing using Strategic Information Design for Quantal Response Travelers

Sainath Sanga·Venkata Sriram Siddhardh Nadendla·Sajal K. Das

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Traditional selfish routing literature quantifies inefficiency in transportation systems with single-attribute costs using price-of-anarchy (PoA), and provides various technical approaches (e.g. marginal cost pricing) to improve PoA of the overall network. Unfortunately, practical transportation systems have dynamic, multi-attribute costs and the state-of-the-art technical approaches proposed in the literature are infeasible for practical deployment. In this paper, we offer a paradigm shift to selfish routing via characterizing idiosyncratic, multi-attribute costs at boundedly-rational travelers, as well as improving network efficiency using strategic information design. Specifically, we model the interaction between the system and travelers as a Stackelberg game, where travelers adopt multi-attribute logit responses. We model the strategic information design as an optimization problem, and develop a novel approximate algorithm to steer Logit Response travelers towards social welfare using strategic Information design (in short, LoRI). We demonstrate the performance of LoRI on a Wheatstone network with multi-modal route choices at the travelers. In our simulation experiments, we find that LoRI outperforms SSSP in terms of system utility, especially when there is a motive mismatch between the two systems and improves social welfare. For instance, we find that LoRI persuades a traveler towards a socially optimal route for 66.66% of the time on average, when compared to SSSP, when the system has 0.3 weight on carbon emissions. However, we also present a tradeoff between system performance and runtime in our simulation results.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sainath Sanga, Venkata Sriram Siddhardh Nadendla, Sajal K. Das. 2021-11-30. Maximizing Social Welfare in Selfish Multi-Modal Routing using Strategic Information Design for Quantal Response Travelers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.15069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗