SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2112.00320

Multistage Online Maxmin Allocation of Indivisible Entities

Abstract

We consider an online allocation problem that involves a set $P$ of $n$ players and a set $E$ of $m$ indivisible entities over discrete time steps $1,2,\ldots,\tau$. At each time step $t \in [1,\tau]$, for every entity $e \in E$, there is a restriction list $L_t(e)$ that prescribes the subset of players to whom $e$ can be assigned and a non-negative value $v_t(e,p)$ of $e$ to every player $p \in P$. The sets $P$ and $E$ are fixed beforehand. The sets $L_t(\cdot)$ and values $v_t(\cdot,\cdot)$ are given in an online fashion. An allocation is a distribution of $E$ among $P$, and we are interested in the minimum total value of the entities received by a player according to the allocation. In the static case, it is NP-hard to find an optimal allocation the maximizes this minimum value. On the other hand, $\rho$-approximation algorithms have been developed for certain values of $\rho \in (0,1]$. We propose a $w$-lookahead algorithm for the multistage online maxmin allocation problem for any fixed $w \geq 1$ in which the restriction lists and values of entities may change between time steps, and there is a fixed stability reward for an entity to be assigned to the same player from one time step to the next. The objective is to maximize the sum of the minimum values and stability rewards over the time steps $1, 2, \ldots, \tau$. Our algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of $(1-c)\rho$, where $c$ is the positive root of the equation $wc^2 = \rho (w+1)(1-c)$. When $w = 1$, it is greater than $\frac{\rho}{4\rho+2} + \frac{\rho}{10}$, which improves upon the previous ratio of $\frac{\rho}{4\rho+2 - 2^{1-\tau}(2\rho+1)}$ obtained for the case of 1-lookahead.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Siu-Wing Cheng. 2021-12-01. Multistage Online Maxmin Allocation of Indivisible Entities. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.00320

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS