SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2112.01092

Extracting seizure onset from surface EEG with Independent Component Analysis: insights from simultaneous scalp and intracerebral EEG

Abstract

The success of stereoelectroencephalographic (SEEG) investigations depends crucially on the hypotheses on the putative location of the seizure onset zone. This information is derived from non-invasive data either based on visual analysis or advanced source localization algorithms. While source localization applied to interictal spikes recorded on scalp is the classical method, it does not provide unequivocal information regarding the seizure onset zone. Raw ictal activity contains a mixture of signals originating from several regions of the brain as well as EMG artifacts, hampering direct input to the source localization algorithms. We therefore introduce a methodology that disentangles the various sources contributing to the scalp ictal activity using independent component analysis and uses equivalent current dipole localization as putative locus of ictal sources. We validated the results of our analysis pipeline by performing long-term simultaneous scalp -- intracerebral (SEEG) recordings in 14 patients and analyzing the wavelet coherence between the independent component encoding the ictal discharge and the SEEG signals in 8 patients passing the inclusion criteria. Our results show that invasively recorded ictal onset patterns, including low-voltage fast activity, can be captured by the independent component analysis of scalp EEG. The visibility of the ictal activity strongly depends on the depth of the sources. The equivalent current dipole localization can point to the seizure onset zone (SOZ) with an accuracy that can be as high as 10mm for superficially located sources, that gradually decreases for deeper seizure generators, averaging at 47 mm in the 8 analyzed patients. Independent component analysis is therefore shown to have a promising SOZ localizing value, indicating whether the seizure onset zone is neocortical, and its approximate location, or located in mesial structures. That may contribute to a better crafting of the hypotheses used as basis of the stereo-EEG implantations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrei Barborica, Ioana Mindruta, Laurent Sheybani, Laurent Spinelli, Irina Oane, Constantin Pistol, Cristian Donos, Victor J López-Madrona, Serge Vulliemoz, Christian Bénar, Víctor López-Madrona, Christian-George Bénar. 2021-12-02. Extracting seizure onset from surface EEG with Independent Component Analysis: insights from simultaneous scalp and intracerebral EEG. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102838

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Platonic brain bridge hypothesis: human brain networks as an architectural prior for omni models

We propose the Platonic brain bridge hypothesis: omni models, which process video, audio and text jointly like the brain, converge on brain-like representations, and the correspondence is bidirectional. From model to brain, brain-likeness of seven omni models is stable across participants, and our encoding models on their internal hidden states rank first on the Algonauts 2025 out-of-distribution leaderboard. From brain to model, three contributions follow. Brain-MoE gives seven cortical networks one brain-pretrained expert each and raises held-out accuracy in all 15 model-benchmark pairs by 6.42 percentage points on average. Brain-AVQA builds questions from video clips labelled by the most responsive brain network; the real network-to-expert map exceeds shuffled maps in-domain on all three models. Brain-Scope uses sparse autoencoders to localize the correspondence to a small subset whose removal weakens brain prediction in all three bases tested. Human brain networks are therefore a usable architectural prior for omni models.

q-bio.NC

Degeneracy along the sensorimotor hierarchy: motor control within a framework larger than redundancy

Motor control has described the surplus of solutions available to the nervous system as redundancy, a term that names duplication: interchangeable elements, robust to loss but incapable of differential adaptation. Biology has had a second term for twenty-five years. Degeneracy names elements that are not interchangeable and are nonetheless isofunctional with respect to a given output, and it supports adaptability, since non-identical elements necessarily diverge in some context. Circuit neuroscience has relabeled its own results accordingly, while motor control has kept the older vocabulary. Neuromechanical models, by placing a spinal circuit in the loop with a musculoskeletal apparatus, bring the two traditions onto the same class of objects. We restate the Edelman and Tononi distinction for sensorimotor systems and derive an operational requirement: not the existence of multiple solutions, but their divergence in contexts they were not selected for. Three influential studies each meet part of that requirement and none meets all. We then argue that degeneracy and redundancy coexist along the sensorimotor hierarchy in a proportion that varies continuously, and that this proportion is measurable: computing degeneracy twice for the same configuration, once with muscle activation as the output and once with the movement produced, isolates what the musculoskeletal apparatus contributes. Five predictions follow, with the single outcome that would refute the proposal. We set out the adaptations the measurement requires in a nonlinear, non-stationary, closed-loop system, and what changes for motor control once solutions are no longer assumed equivalent: the question shifts from which rule selects a command to what the repertoire of the system still allows.

q-bio.NC

pyAvalanches: A Python Package for Analyzing Spatiotemporal Propagation in Neuronal Avalanches

The analysis of neuronal avalanches offers insights into brain dynamics utilizing the framework of criticality, but the reproducibility and comparability of studies are limited by the use of fragmented, lab-specific scripts. To address this issue, we introduce pyAvalanches, an open-source Python package providing a standardized, end-to-end pipeline for avalanche analysis from electrophysiological recordings (e.g., electroencephalography-EEG). Starting from the detection of neuronal avalanches the package provides their core statistical characterization, including size and duration distributions. Beyond this, the main aim of pyAvalanches is to characterize the spatiotemporal organization of activity propagation during avalanches. To this end, the core innovation of pyAvalanches is the compuation of Avalanche Transition Matrices (ATMs) to map spatiotemporal propagation patterns. Building on this, the package derives network-based metrics from the ATMs, bridging the study of the topology and organization of the underlying dynamical interactions with network neuroscience adopting the framework of neuronal avalanches. The entire workflow is encapsulated in a modular and scikit-learn compatible architecture. We demonstrate the utility of pyAvalanches through an illustrative group-level analysis on a public resting-state EEG dataset, comparing propagation patterns across different clinical populations. By providing a user-friendly, tested, and extensible tool, pyAvalanches facilitates reproducible research, enables the development of novel avalanche-based biomarkers, and makes complex avalanche analysis accessible to a broader scientific community. The package is fully documented and distributed via the Python Package Index (PyPI).

q-bio.NC