Flow Metrics on Graphs

Lior Kalman; Robert Krauthgamer

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2112.06916

Flow Metrics on Graphs

Lior Kalman·Robert Krauthgamer

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a graph with non-negative edge weights, there are various ways to interpret the edge weights and induce a metric on the vertices of the graph. A few examples are shortest-path, when interpreting the weights as lengths; resistance distance, when thinking of the graph as an electrical network and the weights are resistances; and the inverse of minimum $st$-cut, when thinking of the weights as capacities. It is known that the 3 above-mentioned metrics can all be derived from flows, when formalizing them as convex optimization problems. This key observation led us to studying a family of metrics that are derived from flows, which we call flow metrics, that gives a natural interpolation between the above metrics using a parameter $p$. We make the first steps in studying the flow metrics, and mainly focus on two aspects: (a) understanding basic properties of the flow metrics, either as an optimization problem (e.g. finding relations between the flow problem and the dual potential problem) and as a metric function (e.g. understanding their structure and geometry); and (b) considering methods for reducing the size of graphs, either by removing vertices or edges while approximating the flow metrics, and thus attaining a smaller instance that can be used to accelerate running time of algorithms and reduce their storage requirements. Our main result is a lower bound for the number of edges required for a resistance sparsifier in the worst case. Furthermore, we present a method for reducing the number of edges in a graph while approximating the flow metrics, by utilizing a method of [Cohen and Peng, 2015] for reducing the size of matrices. In addition, we show that the flow metrics satisfy a stronger version of the triangle inequality, which gives some information about their structure and geometry.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Lior Kalman, Robert Krauthgamer. 2021-12-10. Flow Metrics on Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06916

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗