Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2112.07859

Finite-Sample Analysis of Decentralized Q-Learning for Stochastic Games

Zuguang Gao·Qianqian Ma·Tamer Başar·John R. Birge
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Learning in stochastic games is arguably the most standard and fundamental setting in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). In this paper, we consider decentralized MARL in stochastic games in the non-asymptotic regime. In particular, we establish the finite-sample complexity of fully decentralized Q-learning algorithms in a significant class of general-sum stochastic games (SGs) - weakly acyclic SGs, which includes the common cooperative MARL setting with an identical reward to all agents (a Markov team problem) as a special case. We focus on the practical while challenging setting of fully decentralized MARL, where neither the rewards nor the actions of other agents can be observed by each agent. In fact, each agent is completely oblivious to the presence of other decision makers. Both the tabular and the linear function approximation cases have been considered. In the tabular setting, we analyze the sample complexity for the decentralized Q-learning algorithm to converge to a Markov perfect equilibrium (Nash equilibrium). With linear function approximation, the results are for convergence to a linear approximated equilibrium - a new notion of equilibrium that we propose - which describes that each agent's policy is a best reply (to other agents) within a linear space. Numerical experiments are also provided for both settings to demonstrate the results.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.LGcs.MA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zuguang Gao, Qianqian Ma, Tamer Başar, John R. Birge. 2021-12-15. Finite-Sample Analysis of Decentralized Q-Learning for Stochastic Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.07859

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗