Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2112.10214

Modelling of Received Signals in Molecular Communication Systems based machine learning: Comparison of azure machine learning and Python tools

Soha Mohamed·Mahmoud S. Fayed
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Molecular communication (MC) implemented on Nano networks has extremely attractive characteristics in terms of energy efficiency, dependability, and robustness. Even though, the impact of incredibly slow molecule diffusion and high variability environments remains unknown. Analysis and designs of communication systems usually rely on developing mathematical models that describe the communication channel. However, the underlying channel models are unknown in some systems, such as MC systems, where chemical signals are used to transfer information. In these cases, a new method to analyze and design is needed. In this paper, we concentrate on one critical aspect of the MC system, modelling MC received signal until time t , and demonstrate that using tools from ML makes it promising to train detectors that can be executed well without any information about the channel model. Machine learning (ML) is one of the intelligent methodologies that has shown promising results in the domain. This paper applies Azure Machine Learning (Azure ML) for flexible pavement maintenance regressions problems and solutions. For prediction, four parameters are used as inputs: the receiver radius, transmitter radius, distance between receiver and transmitter, and diffusion coefficient, while the output is mAP (mean average precision) of the received signal. Azure ML enables algorithms that can learn from data and experiences and accomplish tasks without having to be coded. In the established Azure ML, the regression algorithms such as, boost decision tree regression, Bayesian linear regression, neural network, and decision forest regression are selected. The best performance is chosen as an optimality criterion. Finally, a comparison that shows the potential benefits of Azure ML tool over programmed based tool (Python), used by developers on local PCs, is demonstrated

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.ET

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Soha Mohamed, Mahmoud S. Fayed. 2021-12-19. Modelling of Received Signals in Molecular Communication Systems based machine learning: Comparison of azure machine learning and Python tools. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10214

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗