SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2112.11020

Efficient reductions and algorithms for variants of Subset Sum

Abstract

Given $(a_1, \dots, a_n, t) \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}^{n + 1}$, the Subset Sum problem ($\mathsf{SSUM}$) is to decide whether there exists $S \subseteq [n]$ such that $\sum_{i \in S} a_i = t$. There is a close variant of the $\mathsf{SSUM}$, called $\mathsf{Subset~Product}$. Given positive integers $a_1, ..., a_n$ and a target integer $t$, the $\mathsf{Subset~Product}$ problem asks to determine whether there exists a subset $S \subseteq [n]$ such that $\prod_{i \in S} a_i=t$. There is a pseudopolynomial time dynamic programming algorithm, due to Bellman (1957) which solves the $\mathsf{SSUM}$ and $\mathsf{Subset~Product}$ in $O(nt)$ time and $O(t)$ space. In the first part, we present {\em search} algorithms for variants of the Subset Sum problem. Our algorithms are parameterized by $k$, which is a given upper bound on the number of realisable sets (i.e.,~number of solutions, summing exactly $t$). We show that $\mathsf{SSUM}$ with a unique solution is already NP-hard, under randomized reduction. This makes the regime of parametrized algorithms, in terms of $k$, very interesting. Subsequently, we present an $\tilde{O}(k\cdot (n+t))$ time deterministic algorithm, which finds the hamming weight of all the realisable sets for a subset sum instance. We also give a poly$(knt)$-time and $O(\log(knt))$-space deterministic algorithm that finds all the realisable sets for a subset sum instance. In the latter part, we present a simple and elegant randomized $\tilde{O}(n + t)$ time algorithm for $\mathsf{Subset~Product}$. Moreover, we also present a poly$(nt)$ time and $O(\log^2 (nt))$ space deterministic algorithm for the same. We study these problems in the unbounded setting as well. Our algorithms use multivariate FFT, power series and number-theoretic techniques, introduced by Jin and Wu (SOSA'19) and Kane (2010).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pranjal Dutta, Mahesh Sreekumar Rajasree. 2021-12-21. Efficient reductions and algorithms for variants of Subset Sum. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS