SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2201.04375

A course Literature and mathematics

Abstract

This article gives an account of a teaching experience carried out from 2008 to 2021 at the university of Franche-Comt{\'e} as an answer to the ministerial command of proposing cross-disciplinary courses in the curricula. The goal of the experience was to develop simultaneously a discourse on mathematics and a discourse on literature, two independent discourses, but each filled with the gap between one domain and the other and mindful of the flashes of thought that are lightening from one to the other, witnesses of unity in their reasoning. -- Cet article rend compte d'une exp{\'e}rience d'enseignement men{\'e}e de 2008 {\`a} 2012 {\`a} l'universit{\'e} de Franche-Comt{\'e} en r{\'e}ponse {\`a} l'injonction minist{\'e}rielle de proposer des unit{\'e}s transversales dans les maquettes de dipl{\^o}me. Le but de cette exp{\'e}rience a {\'e}t{\'e} de d{\'e}velopper {\`a} la fois un discours sur les math{\'e}matiques et un discours sur la litt{\'e}rature, deux discours ind{\'e}pendants, mais chacun rempli de l'{\'e}cart entre l'un des domaines et l'autre, et attentif aux {\'e}clairs de la pens{\'e}e qui jaillissent de l'un vers l'autre, t{\'e}moignages d'unit{\'e} dans la d{\'e}marche intellectuelle.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Spangle Durac, Claude Merker, Stefan Neuwirth. 2022-01-12. A course Literature and mathematics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.04375

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO