SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2201.04678

Polynomial Turing Compressions for Some Graph Problems Parameterized by Modular-Width

Abstract

A polynomial Turing compression (PTC) for a parameterized problem $L$ is a polynomial time Turing machine that has access to an oracle for a problem $L'$ such that a polynomial in the input parameter bounds each query. Meanwhile, a polynomial (many-one) compression (PC) can be regarded as a restricted variant of PTC where the machine can query the oracle exactly once and must output the same answer as the oracle. Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) and Fortnow and Santhanam (STOC 2008) initiated an impressive hardness theory for PC under the assumption coNP $\not\subseteq$ NP/poly. Since PTC is a generalization of PC, we define $\mathcal{C}$ as the set of all problems that have PTCs but have no PCs under the assumption coNP $\not\subseteq$ NP/poly. Based on the hardness theory for PC, Fernau et al. (STACS 2009) found the first problem Leaf Out-tree($k$) in $\mathcal{C}$. However, very little is known about $\mathcal{C}$, as only a dozen problems were shown to belong to the complexity class in the last ten years. Several problems are open, for example, whether CNF-SAT($n$) and $k$-path are in $\mathcal{C}$, and novel ideas are required to better understand the fundamental differences between PTCs and PCs. In this paper, we enrich our knowledge about $\mathcal{C}$ by showing that several problems parameterized by modular-width ($mw$) belong to $\mathcal{C}$. More specifically, exploiting the properties of the well-studied structural graph parameter $mw$, we demonstrate 17 problems parameterized by $mw$ are in $\mathcal{C}$, such as Chromatic Number($mw$) and Hamiltonian Cycle($mw$). In addition, we develop a general recipe to prove the existence of PTCs for a large class of problems, including our 17 problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Weidong Luo. 2022-01-12. Polynomial Turing Compressions for Some Graph Problems Parameterized by Modular-Width. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.04678

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS