Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2202.05546

Insertion Time of Random Walk Cuckoo Hashing below the Peeling Threshold

Stefan Walzer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Most hash tables have an insertion time of $O(1)$, possibly qualified as expected and/or amortised. While insertions into cuckoo hash tables indeed seem to take $O(1)$ expected time in practice, only polylogarithmic guarantees are proven in all but the simplest of practically relevant cases. Given the widespread use of cuckoo hashing to implement compact dictionaries and Bloom filter alternatives, closing this gap is an important open problem for theoreticians. In this paper, we show that random walk insertions into cuckoo hash tables take $O(1)$ expected amortised time when any number $k \geq 3$ of hash functions is used and the load factor is below the corresponding peeling threshold (e.g. $\approx 0.81$ for $k = 3$). To our knowledge, this is the first meaningful guarantee for constant time insertion for cuckoo hashing that works for $k \in \{3,\dots,9\}$. In addition to being useful in its own right, we hope that our key-centred analysis method can be a stepping stone on the path to the true end goal: $O(1)$ time insertions for all load factors below the load threshold (e.g. $\approx 0.91$ for $k = 3$).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stefan Walzer. 2022-02-11. Insertion Time of Random Walk Cuckoo Hashing below the Peeling Threshold. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05546

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗