SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2203.05778

Redistribution in Public Project Problems via Neural Networks

Abstract

Many important problems in multiagent systems involve resource allocations. Self-interested agents may lie about their valuations if doing so increases their own utilities. Therefore, it is necessary to design mechanisms (collective decision-making rules) with desired properties and objectives. The VCG redistribution mechanisms are efficient (the agents who value the resources the most will be allocated), strategy-proof (the agents have no incentives to lie about their valuations), and weakly budget-balanced (no deficits). We focus on the VCG redistribution mechanisms for the classic public project problem, where a group of agents needs to decide whether or not to build a non-excludable public project. We design mechanisms via neural networks with two welfare-maximizing objectives: optimal in the worst case and optimal in expectation. Previous studies showed two worst-case optimal mechanisms for 3 agents, but worst-case optimal mechanisms have not been identified for more than 3 agents. For maximizing expected welfare, there are no existing results. We use neural networks to design VCG redistribution mechanisms. Neural networks have been used to design the redistribution mechanisms for multi-unit auctions with unit demand. We show that for the public project problem, the previously proposed neural networks, which led to optimal/near-optimal mechanisms for multi-unit auctions with unit demand, perform abysmally for the public project problem. We significantly improve the existing networks on multiple fronts: We conduct a GAN network to generate worst-case type profiles and feed prior distribution into loss function to provide quality gradients for the optimal-in-expectation objective......

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Guanhua Wang, Wuli Zuo, Mingyu Guo. 2022-03-11. Redistribution in Public Project Problems via Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1145/3486622.3493922

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT