SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2203.07711

Maximizing Modular plus Non-monotone Submodular Functions

Abstract

The research problem in this work is the relaxation of maximizing non-negative submodular plus modular with the entire real number domain as its value range over a family of down-closed sets. We seek a feasible point $\mathbf{x}^*$ in the polytope of the given constraint such that $\mathbf{x}^*\in\arg\max_{\mathbf{x}\in\mathcal{P}\subseteq[0,1]^n}F(\mathbf{x})+L(\mathbf{x})$, where $F$, $L$ denote the extensions of the underlying submodular function $f$ and modular function $\ell$. We provide an approximation algorithm named \textsc{Measured Continuous Greedy with Adaptive Weights}, which yields a guarantee $F(\mathbf{x})+L(\mathbf{x})\geq \left(1/e-\mathcal{O}(\epsilon)\right)\cdot f(OPT)+\left(\frac{\beta-e}{e(\beta-1)}-\mathcal{O}(\epsilon)\right)\cdot\ell(OPT)$ under the assumption that the ratio of non-negative part within $\ell(OPT)$ to the absolute value of its negative part is demonstrated by a parameter $\beta\in[0, \infty]$, where $OPT$ is the optimal integral solution for the discrete problem. It is obvious that the factor of $\ell(OPT)$ is $1$ when $\beta=0$, which means the negative part is completely dominant at this time; otherwise the factor is closed to $1/e$ whe $\beta\rightarrow\infty$. Our work first breaks the restriction on the specific value range of the modular function without assuming non-positivity or non-negativity as previous results and quantifies the relative variation of the approximation guarantee for optimal solutions with arbitrary structure. Moreover, we also give an analysis for the inapproximability of the problem we consider. We show a hardness result that there exists no polynomial algorithm whose output $S$ satisfies $f(S)+\ell(S)\geq0.478\cdot f(OPT)+\ell(OPT)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xin Sun, Chenchen Wu, Dachuan Xu, Yang Zhou. 2022-03-15. Maximizing Modular plus Non-monotone Submodular Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07711

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS