SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2203.07713

LDP: Learnable Dynamic Precision for Efficient Deep Neural Network Training and Inference

Abstract

Low precision deep neural network (DNN) training is one of the most effective techniques for boosting DNNs' training efficiency, as it trims down the training cost from the finest bit level. While existing works mostly fix the model precision during the whole training process, a few pioneering works have shown that dynamic precision schedules help DNNs converge to a better accuracy while leading to a lower training cost than their static precision training counterparts. However, existing dynamic low precision training methods rely on manually designed precision schedules to achieve advantageous efficiency and accuracy trade-offs, limiting their more comprehensive practical applications and achievable performance. To this end, we propose LDP, a Learnable Dynamic Precision DNN training framework that can automatically learn a temporally and spatially dynamic precision schedule during training towards optimal accuracy and efficiency trade-offs. It is worth noting that LDP-trained DNNs are by nature efficient during inference. Furthermore, we visualize the resulting temporal and spatial precision schedule and distribution of LDP trained DNNs on different tasks to better understand the corresponding DNNs' characteristics at different training stages and DNN layers both during and after training, drawing insights for promoting further innovations. Extensive experiments and ablation studies (seven networks, five datasets, and three tasks) show that the proposed LDP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) low precision DNN training techniques in terms of training efficiency and achieved accuracy trade-offs. For example, in addition to having the advantage of being automated, our LDP achieves a 0.31\% higher accuracy with a 39.1\% lower computational cost when training ResNet-20 on CIFAR-10 as compared with the best SOTA method.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhongzhi Yu, Yonggan Fu, Shang Wu, Mengquan Li, Haoran You, Yingyan Lin. 2022-03-15. LDP: Learnable Dynamic Precision for Efficient Deep Neural Network Training and Inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07713

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG