SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2203.12431

Bounds for Bias-Adjusted Treatment Effect in Linear Econometric Models

Abstract

In linear econometric models with proportional selection on unobservables, omitted variable bias in estimated treatment effects are real roots of a cubic equation involving estimated parameters from a short and intermediate regression. The roots of the cubic are functions of $\delta$, the degree of selection on unobservables, and $R_{max}$, the R-squared in a hypothetical long regression that includes the unobservable confounder and all observable controls. In this paper I propose and implement a novel algorithm to compute roots of the cubic equation over relevant regions of the $\delta$-$R_{max}$ plane and use the roots to construct bounding sets for the true treatment effect. The algorithm is based on two well-known mathematical results: (a) the discriminant of the cubic equation can be used to demarcate regions of unique real roots from regions of three real roots, and (b) a small change in the coefficients of a polynomial equation will lead to small change in its roots because the latter are continuous functions of the former. I illustrate my method by applying it to the analysis of maternal behavior on child outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Deepankar Basu. 2022-03-23. Bounds for Bias-Adjusted Treatment Effect in Linear Econometric Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12431

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM