SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2203.14058

Constant factor approximations for Lower and Upper bounded Clusterings

Abstract

Clustering is one of the most fundamental problem in Machine Learning. Researchers in the field often require a lower bound on the size of the clusters to maintain anonymity and upper bound for the ease of analysis. Specifying an optimal cluster size is a problem often faced by scientists. In this paper, we present a framework to obtain constant factor approximations for some prominent clustering objectives, with lower and upper bounds on cluster size. This enables scientists to give an approximate cluster size by specifying the lower and the upper bounds for it. Our results preserve the lower bounds but may violate the upper bound a little. %{GroverGD21_LBUBFL_Cocoon} to $2$. %namely, $k$ Center (LUkC) and $k$ Median (LUkM) problem. We study the problems when either of the bounds is uniform. We apply our framework to give the first constant factor approximations for LUkM and its generalization, $k$-facility location problem (LUkFL), with $\beta+1$ factor violation in upper bounds where $\beta$ is the violation of upper bounds in solutions of upper bounded $k$-median and $k$-facility location problems respectively. We also present a result on LUkC with uniform upper bounds and, its generalization, lower and (uniform) upper bounded $k$ supplier problem (LUkS). The approach also gives a result on lower and upper bounded facility location problem (LUFL), improving upon the upper bound violation of $5/2$ due to Gupta et al. We also reduce the violation in upper bounds for a special case when the gap between the lower and upper bounds is not too small.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Neelima Gupta, Sapna Grover, Rajni Dabas. 2022-03-26. Constant factor approximations for Lower and Upper bounded Clusterings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.14058

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS