SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2204.00247

Infinite Combinatorics revisited in the absence of Axiom of Choice

Abstract

We investigate the provability of classical combinatorial theorems in ZF. Using combinatorial arguments, we establish the following results for each infinite cardinal ${\kappa}\in On$, (1) ${\kappa}^+\to ({\kappa},{\omega}+1)$, (2) any family $\mathcal A\subset [{On}]^{<{\omega}}$ of size ${\kappa}^+$ contains a $\Delta$-system of size ${\kappa}$, (3) given a set mapping $F:{\kappa}\to {[{\kappa}]}^{<{\omega}}$, the set ${\kappa}$ has a partition into ${\omega}$-many $F$-free sets, By employing Karagila's method of absoluteness, we prove the following for each uncountable cardinal ${\kappa}\in On$, (4) given a set mapping $F:{\kappa}\to {[{\kappa}^]}^{<{\omega}}$, there is an $F$-free set of cardinality ${\kappa}$, (5) for each natural number $n$, every family $\mathcal A\subset {[{\kappa}]}^{{\omega}}$with $|A\cap B|\le n$ for $\{A,B\}\in {[\mathcal A]}^{2}$ has property $B$, In contrast to (5), we show that the following statement is not provable from ZF + $cf({\omega}_1)={\omega}_1$: (6*) every family $\mathcal A\subset {[{\omega}_1]}^{{\omega}}$ with $|A\cap B|\le 1$ for $\{A,B\}\in {[\mathcal A]}^{2}$ is "essentially disjoint" . The following statements are not provable in ZF, but they are equivalent in ZF: (i) $cf({\omega}_1)={\omega}_1$, (ii) ${\omega}_1\to ({\omega}_1,{\omega}+1)^2$, (iii) any family $\mathcal A\subset [{On}]^{<{\omega}}$ of size ${\omega}_1$ contains a $\Delta$-system of size ${\omega}_1$. A function $f$ is a "uniform denumeration on ${\omega}_1$" iff $dom(f)={\omega}_1$ and for every ${\alpha}<{\omega}_1$, $f({\alpha})$ is a function from ${\omega}$ onto ${\alpha}$. It is evident that the existence of a uniform denumeration of ${\omega}_1$ implies $cf({\omega}_1)={\omega}_1$. We prove that the failure of the reverse implication is equiconsistent with the existence of an inaccessible cardinal.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tamás Csernák, Lajos Soukup. 2022-04-01. Infinite Combinatorics revisited in the absence of Axiom of Choice. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.00247

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO