Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2204.04371

Learning to Schedule Multi-Server Jobs with Fluctuated Processing Speeds

Hailiang Zhao·Shuiguang Deng·Feiyi Chen·Jianwei Yin·Schahram Dustdar·Albert Y. Zomaya
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Multi-server jobs are imperative in modern cloud computing systems. A noteworthy feature of multi-server jobs is that, they usually request multiple computing devices simultaneously for their execution. How to schedule multi-server jobs online with a high system efficiency is a topic of great concern. Firstly, the scheduling decisions have to satisfy the service locality constraints. Secondly, the scheduling decisions needs to be made online without the knowledge of future job arrivals. Thirdly, and most importantly, the actual service rate experienced by a job is usually in fluctuation because of the dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) and power oversubscription techniques when multiple types of jobs co-locate. A majority of online algorithms with theoretical performance guarantees are proposed. However, most of them require the processing speeds to be knowable, thereby the job completion times can be exactly calculated. To present a theoretically guaranteed online scheduling algorithm for multi-server jobs without knowing actual processing speeds apriori, in this paper, we propose ESDP (Efficient Sampling-based Dynamic Programming), which learns the distribution of the fluctuated processing speeds over time and simultaneously seeks to maximize the cumulative overall utility. The cumulative overall utility is formulated as the sum of the utilities of successfully serving each multi-server job minus the penalty on the operating, maintaining, and energy cost. ESDP is proved to have a polynomial complexity and a logarithmic regret, which is a State-of-the-Art result. We also validate it with extensive simulations and the results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms several benchmark policies with improvements by up to 73%, 36%, and 28%, respectively.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hailiang Zhao, Shuiguang Deng, Feiyi Chen, Jianwei Yin, Schahram Dustdar, Albert Y. Zomaya. 2022-04-09. Learning to Schedule Multi-Server Jobs with Fluctuated Processing Speeds. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.04371

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗