arXiv · 2204.10304
Measuring artificial intelligence: a systematic assessment and implications for governance
Abstract
Governing artificial intelligence (AI) inventions is a major policy concern, yet definitions and measurement remain contested. We compare four patent-based approaches reflecting distinct understandings of AI. Using US patents (1990-2019), we assess the degree to which each approach classifies AI as a general-purpose technology (GPT) and examine patent concentration--two central policy-relevant dimensions. The approaches overlap in just 1.37% of patents, defining between 3-17% of all US patents in 2019 as AI. All approaches confirm AI's GPT characteristics, with the smallest keyword-based set exhibiting the highest growth and generality. High GPTness indicates public good characteristics, justifying public support. Across methods, AI patents concentrate among a few firms, highlighting market power and regulatory challenges. Policy implementation, thus, requires careful consideration of multiple classification methods to ensure robust, inclusive, and effective AI governance.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Kerstin Hötte, Taheya Tarannum, Vilhelm Verendel, Lauren Bennett. 2022-04-21. Measuring artificial intelligence: a systematic assessment and implications for governance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.10304
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.