Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2205.02351

On Preemptive Scheduling of Unrelated Machines Using Linear Programming

Nodari Vakhania
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider a basic problem of preemptive scheduling of $n$ non-simultaneously released jobs on a group of $m$ unrelated parallel machines so as to minimize maximum job completion time, the makespan. In the scheduling literature, the problem is commonly considered to be solvable in polynomial time by linear programming (LP) techniques proposed in Lawler and Labetoulle \cite{ll78}. The authors in \cite{ll78} give a LP formulation of the version with simultaneously released jobs and show how an optimal solution to this LP can be used to construct an optimal schedule to the latter problem. As the current study shows, for non-simultaneously released jobs, unlikely, there exist a linear program such that a schedule with the minimum makespan can be constructed based on an optimal LP solution. We also prove that, in case no splitting of the same job on a machine is allowed (i.e., job part assigned to a machine is to be processed without an interruption on that machine), the problem is NP-hard. As a side result, we obtain that, whenever job splitting is not allowed, given an optimal LP solution, it is NP-hard to find an optimal schedule with the minimum makespan that agrees with that LP solution. We also extend the schedule construction procedure based on an optimal LP solution from Lawler and Labetoulle \cite{ll78} for non-simultaneously released jobs. The extended procedure, among all feasible schedules that agree with any feasible (not necessarily optimal) LP solution, generates one with the minimum makespan. Such procedure is helpful, in particular, because, as we show, there may exist no optimal schedule that agrees with an optimal LP solution if jobs are non-simultaneously released.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nodari Vakhania. 2022-05-04. On Preemptive Scheduling of Unrelated Machines Using Linear Programming. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.02351

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗