SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2205.07191

Locally closed sets and submaximal spaces

Abstract

A topological space $X$ is called submaximal if every dense subset of $X$ is open. In this paper, we show that if $\beta X$, the Stone-\v{C}ech compactification of $X$, is a submaximal space, then $X$ is a compact space and hence $\beta X=X$. We also prove that if $\upsilon X$, the Hewitt realcompactification of $X$, is submaximal and first countable and $X$ is without isolated point, then $X$ is realcompact and hence $\upsilon X=X$. We observe that every submaximal Hausdorff space is pseudo-finite. It turns out that if $\upsilon X$ is a submaximal space, then $X$ is a pseudo-finite $\mu$-compact space. An example is given which shows that $X$ may be submaximal but $\upsilon X$ may not be submaximal. Given a topological space $(X,{\mathcal T})$, the collection of all locally closed subsets of $X$ forms a base for a topology on $X$ which is denotes by ${\mathcal T_l}$. We study some topological properties between $(X,{\mathcal T})$ and $(X,{\mathcal T_l})$, such as we show that a) $(X,{\mathcal T_l})$ is discrete if and only if $(X,{\mathcal T})$ is a $T_D$-space; b) $(X,{\mathcal T})$ is a locally indiscrete space if and only if ${\mathcal T}={\mathcal T_l}$; c) $(X,{\mathcal T})$ is indiscrete space if and only if $(X,{\mathcal T_l})$ is connected. We see that, in locally indiscrete spaces, the concepts of $T_0$, $T_D$, $T_\frac{1}{2}$, $T_1$, submaximal and discrete coincide. Finally, we prove that every clopen subspace of an lc-compact space is lc-compact.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rostam Mohamadian. 2022-05-15. Locally closed sets and submaximal spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07191

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN