SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2205.07593

A $(3+\varepsilon)$-Approximate Correlation Clustering Algorithm in Dynamic Streams

Abstract

Grouping together similar elements in datasets is a common task in data mining and machine learning. In this paper, we study streaming algorithms for correlation clustering, where each pair of elements is labeled either similar or dissimilar. The task is to partition the elements and the objective is to minimize disagreements, that is, the number of dissimilar elements grouped together and similar elements that get separated. Our main contribution is a semi-streaming algorithm that achieves a $(3 + \varepsilon)$-approximation to the minimum number of disagreements using a single pass over the stream. In addition, the algorithm also works for dynamic streams. Our approach builds on the analysis of the PIVOT algorithm by Ailon, Charikar, and Newman [JACM'08] that obtains a $3$-approximation in the centralized setting. Our design allows us to sparsify the input graph by ignoring a large portion of the nodes and edges without a large extra cost as compared to the analysis of PIVOT. This sparsification makes our technique applicable in models such as semi-streaming, where sparse graphs can typically be handled much more efficiently. Our work improves on the approximation ratio of the recent single-pass $5$-approximation algorithm and on the number of passes of the recent $O(1/\varepsilon)$-pass $(3 + \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm [Behnezhad, Charikar, Ma, Tan FOCS'22, SODA'23]. Our algorithm is also more robust and can be applied in dynamic streams. Furthermore, it is the first single pass $(3 + \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm that uses polynomial post-processing time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mélanie Cambus, Fabian Kuhn, Etna Lindy, Shreyas Pai, Jara Uitto. 2022-05-16. A $(3+\varepsilon)$-Approximate Correlation Clustering Algorithm in Dynamic Streams. https://doi.org/10.46298/theoretics.25.6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS