SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2205.08577

PROLIFIC: Projection-based Test for Lack of Importance of Smooth Functional Effect in Crossover Design

Abstract

Wearable devices for continuous monitoring of electronic health increased attention due to their richness in information. Often, inference is drawn from features that quantify some summary of the data, leading to a loss of information that could be useful when one utilizes the functional nature of the response. When functional trajectories are observed repeated over time, it is termed longitudinal functional data. This work is motivated by the interest to assess the efficacy of a noninflammatory medication, meloxicam, on the daily activity levels of household cats with a pre-existing condition of osteoarthritis under a crossover design. These activity profiles are recorded at a minute level by accelerometer over the entire study period. To this aspect, we propose an orthogonal projection-based test pseudo generalized F test for significance of the functional treatment effect under a functional additive crossover model after adjusting for the carryover effect and other baseline covariates. Under mild conditions, we derive the asymptotic null distribution of the test statistic when the projection function for the underlying Hilbert space is estimated from the data. In finite sample numerical studies, the proposed test maintains the size, is powerful to detect the significance of the smooth effect of meloxicam, and is very efficient compared to bootstrap-based alternatives.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Salil Koner, Ana-Maria Staicu, Arnab Maity. 2022-05-17. PROLIFIC: Projection-based Test for Lack of Importance of Smooth Functional Effect in Crossover Design. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08577

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME