Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2205.14026

On-Device Voice Authentication with Paralinguistic Privacy

Ranya Aloufi·Hamed Haddadi·David Boyle
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Using our voices to access, and interact with, online services raises concerns about the trade-offs between convenience, privacy, and security. The conflict between maintaining privacy and ensuring input authenticity has often been hindered by the need to share raw data, which contains all the paralinguistic information required to infer a variety of sensitive characteristics. Users of voice assistants put their trust in service providers; however, this trust is potentially misplaced considering the emergence of first-party 'honest-but-curious' or 'semi-honest' threats. A further security risk is presented by imposters gaining access to systems by pretending to be the user leveraging replay or 'deepfake' attacks. Our objective is to design and develop a new voice input-based system that offers the following specifications: local authentication to reduce the need for sharing raw voice data, local privacy preservation based on user preferences, allowing more flexibility in integrating such a system given target applications privacy constraints, and achieving good performance in these targeted applications. The key idea is to locally derive token-based credentials based on unique-identifying attributes obtained from the user's voice and offer selective sensitive information filtering before transmitting raw data. Our system consists of (i) 'VoiceID', boosted with a liveness detection technology to thwart replay attacks; (ii) a flexible privacy filter that allows users to select the level of privacy protection they prefer for their data. The system yields 98.68% accuracy in verifying legitimate users with cross-validation and runs in tens of milliseconds on a CPU and single-core ARM processor without specialized hardware. Our system demonstrates the feasibility of filtering raw voice input closer to users, in accordance with their privacy preferences, while maintaining their authenticity.

Explore related subjects

cs.CY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ranya Aloufi, Hamed Haddadi, David Boyle. 2022-05-27. On-Device Voice Authentication with Paralinguistic Privacy. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Work, Wellbeing, and Choice: Empirical Lessons for AI Futures

Advances in AI-driven automation have raised questions about how humans might find wellbeing in a world where paid employment is less necessary or less available than before. Paid work has been variously characterized as both a contributor and an impediment to human wellbeing. What is already known about the relationship between paid work and wellbeing? What factors influence wellbeing among people who do not work---or who do not need to work? And how might these factors bear upon prospective AI-induced economic transformations? To help provide empirical grounding for these questions, we survey the psychological, sociological, and economic literature that investigates the relationship between wellbeing and work. We draw on evidence from multiple populations, including the unemployed, retirees, lottery winners, and financially dependent spouses. This comparative review draws from studies across OECD countries, China, India, and Gulf states. We identify three key factors that mediate the relationship between work status and wellbeing: (1) agency and choice---whether the exit from work is voluntary or involuntary, as well as long-term agency; (2) the availability of alternative sources of work's latent benefits---such as volunteering, hobbies, or state-provisioned employment; and (3) social and systemic context---including cultural norms around work and the robustness of social safety nets. We draw on these three factors to derive specific implications for different AI automation scenarios, connecting the empirical evidence to concrete policy considerations.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

From Digital Accountability to Accountable Digitality Through Needs-Aware Information Systems: The Case of Auditable Child-Welfare Judgments

Digital accountability research asks how digital systems can, among other aims, be made transparent, explainable, auditable, contestable, and supportive of ongoing learning and improvement. This paper reverses the question: how can digital transformation make established human institutions more accountable? It theorizes this reversal as accountable digitality and specifies needs-aware information systems as the mediating mechanism. The hard and paradigmatic case is child-welfare judgment, where best-interest procedures must protect children, preserve confidentiality, and respect judicial independence while enabling aggregate learning about needs, reasons, exceptions, and disparities. The case is used diagnostically and illustratively to derive and examine the design logic, not as empirical evidence or validation. Conceptual design-oriented analysis decomposes and recombines digital and legal accountability under child-rights constraints, deriving a canonical theory-to-design chain, contingent mechanisms, implications, and safeguards. It advances IS responsibility and ethics research by showing how privacy-preserving, co-created, needs-aware information systems can support institutional self-knowledge and auditable justice.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

(Whose defaults?) Is artificial intelligence reorienting archaeological methods?

Generative AI and the practice of "vibe coding" are changing how archaeologists carry out computational research, but their effects on the discipline's range of methods is still understudied. In this paper, we evaluate whether large language models (LLMs) are narrowing the variety of methods archaeologists use. We first analysed approximately 119,000 archaeology abstracts from Scopus, covering publications from 2010 to 2025. Using a locally run LLM, we identified the computational methods reported in each abstract and organised them into 25 broad categories (L2) and 241 finer clusters (L3). A Bayesian Dirichlet-multinomial model of method composition within sub-disciplines found a small but credible shift in method use after 2023. However, this shift was smaller than the variation already present across the full study period. No individual technique showed a significant change, and overall methodological diversity increased rather than declined. We then ran a controlled experiment to see whether LLMs recommend a narrower set of methods than archaeologists have used in practice. Two different open-weight models were asked to suggest methods for 28 archaeological research problems, with prompts providing three levels of methodological guidance: novice, intermediate, and expert. Recommendation diversity was much lower than in the published literature, particularly without methodological guidance. The models also tended to favour methods that were widely used before 2023, and their recommendations more closely resembled the post-2023 literature. Taken together, these results are consistent with LLMs pushing methodological choice towards convergence, although our study cannot establish a causal effect. They raise a broader question: how can archaeology retain methodological diversity as LLMs become more involved in research?

cs.CY↗