SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2206.01360

Balancing Flow Time and Energy Consumption

Abstract

In this paper, we study the following batch scheduling model: find a schedule that minimizes total flow time for $n$ uniform length jobs, with release times and deadlines, where the machine is only actively processing jobs in at most $k$ synchronized batches of size at most $B$. Prior work on such batch scheduling models has considered only feasibility with no regard to the flow time of the schedule. However, algorithms that minimize the cost from the scheduler's perspective -- such as ones that minimize the active time of the processor -- can result in schedules where the total flow time is arbitrarily high \cite{ChangGabowKhuller}. Such schedules are not valuable from the perspective of the client. In response, our work provides dynamic programs which minimize flow time subject to active time constraints. Our main contribution focuses on jobs with agreeable deadlines; for such job instances, we introduce dynamic programs that achieve runtimes of O$(B \cdot k \cdot n)$ for unit jobs and O$(B \cdot k \cdot n^5)$ for uniform length jobs. These results improve upon our modification of a different, classical dynamic programming approach by Baptiste. While the modified DP works when deadlines are non-agreeable, this solution is more expensive, with runtime $O(B \cdot k^2 \cdot n^7)$ \cite{Baptiste00}.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sami Davies, Samir Khuller, Shirley Zhang. 2022-06-03. Balancing Flow Time and Energy Consumption. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.01360

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS