Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2206.04959

Merak: An Efficient Distributed DNN Training Framework with Automated 3D Parallelism for Giant Foundation Models

Zhiquan Lai·Shengwei Li·Xudong Tang·Keshi Ge·Weijie Liu·Yabo Duan·Linbo Qiao·Dongsheng Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Foundation models are becoming the dominant deep learning technologies. Pretraining a foundation model is always time-consumed due to the large scale of both the model parameter and training dataset. Besides being computing-intensive, the training process is extremely memory-intensive and communication-intensive. These features make it necessary to apply 3D parallelism, which integrates data parallelism, pipeline model parallelism and tensor model parallelism, to achieve high training efficiency. To achieve this goal, some custom software frameworks such as Megatron-LM and DeepSpeed are developed. However, current 3D parallelism frameworks still meet two issues: i) they are not transparent to model developers, which need to manually modify the model to parallelize training. ii) their utilization of computation, GPU memory and network bandwidth are not sufficient. We propose Merak, an automated 3D parallelism deep learning training framework with high resource utilization. Merak automatically deploys with an automatic model partitioner, which uses a graph sharding algorithm on a proxy representation of the model. Merak also presents the non-intrusive API for scaling out foundation model training with minimal code modification. In addition, we design a high-performance 3D parallel runtime engine in Merak. It uses several techniques to exploit available training resources, including shifted critical path pipeline schedule that brings a higher computation utilization, stage-aware recomputation that makes use of idle worker memory, and sub-pipelined tensor model parallelism that overlaps communication and computation. Experiments on 64 GPUs show Merak can speedup the training performance over the state-of-the-art 3D parallelism frameworks of models with 1.5, 2.5, 8.3, and 20 billion parameters by up to 1.42X, 1.39X, 1.43X, and 1.61X, respectively.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.DCcs.MA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zhiquan Lai, Shengwei Li, Xudong Tang, Keshi Ge, Weijie Liu, Yabo Duan, Linbo Qiao, Dongsheng Li. 2022-06-10. Merak: An Efficient Distributed DNN Training Framework with Automated 3D Parallelism for Giant Foundation Models. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpds.2023.3247001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗