Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2206.07266

Deployment of AGRI-BOT in Greenhouse Administration

Ruchita Bhadre·Prathamesh Yeole
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Modern agriculture is constantly evolving to increase production despite unfavorable environmental conditions. A promising approach is 'greenhouse cultivation' providing a microclimate to the cultivated plants to overcome unfavorable climate. However, massive-sized greenhouses develop non-uniform micro-climate throughout the complex requiring high degree of human supervision. We propose deploying an Agri-Bot to create and maintain positive ecological conditions in the greenhouse, reducing labor costs and increasing production. The prototype will contain two primary systems, the navigation system and the data analytics system. The navigation system will be controlled by an Arduino, and data analytics will be handled using an ESP8266 microchip. Numerous sensors for measuring the greenhouse parameters will be mounted on the robot. It will follow a predefined path, while taking readings at checkpoints. The microchip will collect and process data from sensors, transmit to the cloud, and give commands to the actuators. The soil and climate parameters like temperature, humidity, light intensity, soil moisture, pH will be measured periodically. When the parameters are not within a specified range, the Agri-Bot will take corrective actions like switching on blowers/heaters, starting irrigation etc. If external intervention is required, eg., fertilizer, it will indicate accordingly. Deploying such an Agri-Bot for monitoring and controlling microclimate in large-scale greenhouses can mitigate labor costs while increasing productivity. In spite of an initial cost, it can provide a high return on investment by providing flexibility, low power consumption and easy management to help greenhouse be water efficient, provide evenly dispersed and controlled sunlight intensity, temperature and humidity.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.NI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ruchita Bhadre, Prathamesh Yeole. 2022-06-15. Deployment of AGRI-BOT in Greenhouse Administration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07266

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗