Longest Common Subsequence: Tabular vs. Closed-Form Equation Computation of Subsequence Probability

Alireza Abdi; Mohsen Hooshmand

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2206.11726

Longest Common Subsequence: Tabular vs. Closed-Form Equation Computation of Subsequence Probability

Alireza Abdi·Mohsen Hooshmand

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Longest Common Subsequence Problem (LCS) deals with finding the longest subsequence among a given set of strings. The LCS problem is an NP-hard problem which makes it a target for lots of effort to find a better solution with heuristics methods. The baseline for most famous heuristics functions is a tabular random, probabilistic approach. This approach approximates the length of the LCS in each iteration. The combination of beam search and tabular probabilistic-based heuristics has led to a large number of proposals and achievements in algorithms for solving the LCS problem. In this work, we introduce a closed-form equation of the probabilistic table calculation for the first time. Moreover, we present other corresponding forms of the closed-form equation and prove all of them. The closed-form equation opens new ways for analysis and further approximations. Using the theorems and beam search, we propose an analytic method for estimating the length of the LCS of the remaining subsequence. Furthermore, we present another heuristic function based on the Coefficient of Variation. The results show that our proposed methods outperform the state-of-the-art methods on the LCS problem.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Alireza Abdi, Mohsen Hooshmand. 2022-06-23. Longest Common Subsequence: Tabular vs. Closed-Form Equation Computation of Subsequence Probability. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.11726

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗