SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2206.12531

Maximum independent set (stable set) problem: Computational testing with binary search and convex programming using a bin packing approach

Abstract

This paper deals with the maximum independent set (M.I.S.) problem, also known as the stable set problem. The basic mathematical programming model that captures this problem is an Integer Program (I.P.) with zero-one variables $x_j$ and only the \textit{edge inequalities} with an objective function value of the form $~\textstyle \sum_{j=1}^N x_j~$ where $N$ is the number of vertices in the input. We consider $LP(k)$, which is the Linear programming (LP) relaxation of the I.P. with an additional constraint $\textstyle \sum_{j=1}^N x_j = k ~~ (0 \le k \le N). ~~ $ We then consider a convex programming variant $CP(k)$ of $LP(k)$, which is the same as $LP(k)$, except that the objective function is a nonlinear convex function (which we minimise). $~$The M.I.S. problem can be solved by solving $CP(k)$ for every value of $k$ in the interval $~0 \le k \le N~$ where the convex function is minimised using a \it{bin packing} type of approach. In this paper, we present efforts to developing a convex function for $CP(k)$.. However, in the latest version, in the absence of a convex function, we have introduced a new function; and for a certain instance, when we provide partial solutions (that is, for 5 vertices out of 150), the frequency of hitting an optimal complete integer solution increases significantly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Prabhu Manyem. 2022-06-25. Maximum independent set (stable set) problem: Computational testing with binary search and convex programming using a bin packing approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.12531

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS