SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2206.13851

Which arithmetic operations can be performed in constant time in the RAM model with addition?

Abstract

In the literature of algorithms, the specific computation model is often not explicit as it is assumed that the model of computation is the RAM (Random Access Machine) model. However, the RAM model itself is ill-founded in the literature, with disparate definitions and no unified results. The ambition of this paper is to found the RAM model from scratch by exhibiting a RAM model that enjoys interesting algorithmic properties and the robustness of its complexity classes, notably LIN, the class of linear-time computable problems, or the now well-known CONST-DELAY-lin class of enumeration problems computable with constant delay after linear-time preprocessing, The computation model that we define is a RAM whose contents and addresses of registers are $O(N)$, where $N$ is the size (number of registers) of the input, and where the time cost of each instruction is 1 (unit cost criterion). The key to the foundation of our RAM model will be to prove that even if addition is the only primitive operation, such a RAM can still compute all the basic arithmetic operations in constant time after a linear-time preprocessing. Moreover, while the RAM handles only $O(N)$ integers in each register, we will show that our RAM can handle $O(N^d)$ integers, for any fixed d, by storing them on $O(d)$ registers and we will have surprising algorithms that computes many operations acting on these "polynomial" integers -- addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponential, integer logarithm, integer square root (or $c$-th root, for any integer $c$), bitwise logical operations, and, more generally, any operation computable in linear time on a cellular automaton -- in constant time after a linear-time preprocessing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Étienne Grandjean, Louis Jachiet. 2022-06-28. Which arithmetic operations can be performed in constant time in the RAM model with addition?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.13851

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC