arXiv · 2206.14809
Tidally synchronized solar dynamo: a rebuttal
Abstract
The idea of a planetary origin for the solar cycle dates back to the nineteenth century. Despite unsurmounted problems, it is still advocated by some. Stefani, Giesecke, and Weier (2019) thus recently proposed a scenario based on this idea. A key argument they put forward is evidence that the $\sim$11 years-solar cycle is clocked. Their demonstration rests upon the computation of a ratio proposed by Dicke (1978) applied to the solar cycle time series of Schove (1955). I show that their demonstration is invalid, because the assumptions used by Schove to build his time series force a clocked behaviour. I also show that instabilities in a magnetized fluid can produce fluctuation time series that are close to being clocked.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Henri-Claude Nataf. 2022-06-29. Tidally synchronized solar dynamo: a rebuttal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02038-w
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.