Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2206.15100

Computing the Parameterized Burrows--Wheeler Transform Online

Daiki Hashimoto·Diptarama Hendrian·Dominik Köppl·Ryo Yoshinaka·Ayumi Shinohara
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Parameterized strings are a generalization of strings in that their characters are drawn from two different alphabets, where one is considered to be the alphabet of static characters and the other to be the alphabet of parameter characters. Two parameterized strings are a parameterized match if there is a bijection over all characters such that the bijection transforms one string to the other while keeping the static characters (i.e., it behaves as the identity on the static alphabet). Ganguly et al. [SODA 2017] proposed the parameterized Burrows--Wheeler transform (pBWT) as a variant of the Burrows--Wheeler transform for space-efficient parameterized pattern matching. In this paper, we propose an algorithm for computing the pBWT online by reading the characters of a given input string one-by-one from right to left. Our algorithm works in $O(|\Pi| \log n / \log \log n)$ amortized time for each input character, where $n$ and $\Pi$ denote the size of the input string and the alphabet of the parameter characters, respectively.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daiki Hashimoto, Diptarama Hendrian, Dominik Köppl, Ryo Yoshinaka, Ayumi Shinohara. 2022-06-30. Computing the Parameterized Burrows--Wheeler Transform Online. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.15100

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗